1. Dunlop v. United States, No. 472., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, Argued December 21, 1896. , February 15, 1897, Decided
OVERVIEW: A district attorney's improper remarks during closing argument were not prejudicial error because the error was cured by the court's holding that the remarks were improper, and the district attorney then withdrew the remark.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.
