1. Zane v. Hamilton County, No. 115., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, Argued and submitted December 5, 1902. , April 6, 1903, Decided
OVERVIEW: A bond purchaser could not recover on bonds issued by a county under an act because the act was in violation of the constitution of 1848 (Illinois), which contained a restriction that no private or local law which was passed by the general assembly could embrace more than one subject and that should be expressed in the title.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.
