for State Bar Of Arizona
1. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. Lynch, No. 464., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, Submitted October 28, 1912. , December 2, 1912, Decided
OVERVIEW: A statute prohibiting the sale of malt liquor was constitutional because it was reasonably related to the state's goals, and the inclusion of non-intoxicating liquor in the statute did not detract from the state's power to enact the statute.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.