1. Dimick v. Schiedt, No. 78, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, November 9, 1934, Submitted , January 7, 1935, Decided
OVERVIEW: Denial of respondent's motion for a new trial on the ground of inadequate damages after petitioner consented to increase of damages was reversed, since the court had no power to increase the damages in lieu of ordering a new trial.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.
