for Akron Bar Association
1. United States v. Hastings, No. 22, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, November 12, 1935, Argued , December 9, 1935, Decided
OVERVIEW: Where trial court did not rest its decision to quash indictment solely upon invalidity of a law, but also granted motion to quash indictment on wholly independent grounds of insufficiency, judgment of trial court was required to remain in effect.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.