1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp., No. 32, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, October 18-19, 1950, Argued , December 4, 1950, Decided
OVERVIEW: A patent owner's claims against an alleged infringer were invalid because the invention was a combination that only united old elements with no change in respective functions and commercial success without invention would not make patentability.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.
