1. United States v. Harriss, No. 32, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, October 19, 1953, Argued , June 7, 1954, Decided
OVERVIEW: An information was improperly dismissed because the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act, which required disclosure of lobbying activities, was not unconstitutionally vague where offenses to which the Act was directed were plainly within its terms.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.
