for The Cincinnati Bar Association
1. MESAROSH v. UNITED STATES, No. 20, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, October 10, 1956, Argued , October 10, 1956, Decided; November 5, 1956, Opinions delivered
OVERVIEW: The government's concession that the testimony of a prosecution witness was false required a new trial for the convicted defendants, rather than remand for a hearing, because the convictions could not stand on tainted testimony.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.