1. United States v. Raddatz, No. 79-8 , SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, February 25, 1980, Argued , June 23, 1980, Decided
OVERVIEW: Federal Magistrates Act did not require a district court to conduct a de novo hearing on respondent's motion to suppress evidence after receipt of a magistrate's report that was adverse to respondent. The Act adequately protected due process rights.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.
