Serving the people of Montana and their attorneys.

Home

My Legal News
Admission to the Bar

Technology

CLE

Legal Resources

Ethics Opinions

About the Bar

Contact Us

 

Free Case Law Search Results

Search Results: 1 found

Citation: 447 U.S. 667

1. United States v. Raddatz, No. 79-8 , SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, February 25, 1980, Argued , June 23, 1980, Decided

OVERVIEW: Federal Magistrates Act did not require a district court to conduct a de novo hearing on respondent's motion to suppress evidence after receipt of a magistrate's report that was adverse to respondent. The Act adequately protected due process rights.


« Back to Top

Select a case name link to read the full display of the case — absolutely FREE!

If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.

Registration is free.

Get the fully-featured version of this case for $9.00

Tell me more about lexis.com searches!