for Arakansas Bar Association
1. United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, No. 82-1047, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, November 30, 1983, Argued , February 22, 1984, Decided
OVERVIEW: Defendant was not entitled to either a collateral estoppel or a double jeopardy defense for a forfeiture action because the burdens of proof between criminal and civil actions were different and the forfeiture proceeding was civil, not criminal.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.