lexisONE® Community
for King County Bar Association
Free Case Law Search Results
1. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court, No. 83-2166, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, January 7, 1985, Argued , May 28, 1985, Decided
OVERVIEW: An attorney's discipline for print advertising was reversed because the First Amendment protected use of accurate illustrations and truthful, nondeceptive information, and legal advice. The attorney was disciplined for a misleading contingent fee.
Select a case name link to read the full display of the case — absolutely FREE!
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.
