1. Commodity Futures Trading Com. v. Schor, No. 85-621, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, April 29, 1986, Argued , July 7, 1986, Decided ** Together with No. 85-642, ContiCommodity Services, Inc. v. Schor et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
OVERVIEW: Supreme Court allowed petitioner's counterclaim because Congress clearly intended that Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) could decide counterclaims asserted in reparations actions; any intrusion by CFTC on judicial branch was de minimus.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.
