for The Association of the Bar of the City Of New York
1. Leegin Creative Leather Prods. v. PSKS, Inc., No. 06-480, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, March 26, 2007, Argued , June 28, 2007, Decided
OVERVIEW: Where a manufacturer allegedly violated the Sherman Act by entering into agreements with retailers to charge fixed prices, vertical price restraints were to be judged according to the rule of reason, not the per se rule, because, inter alia, procompetitive justifications existed for a manufacturer's use of resale price maintenance.
If you are not a registered lexisONE® Community user, you will be asked to register.
Registration is free.