lexisONE® Community

1. Nanodetex Corp. v. Defiant Techs., No. 08-2123, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, October 15, 2009, Filed

OVERVIEW: Evidence that a member of the technology licensee called a competitor in a subtle, yet forceful attempt to pressure a merger, with costly and prolonged litigation being the cost of refusal, reasonably could have been interpreted as a malicious abuse of legal process so as to support the jury's verdict for the competitor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50.

« Back to Top