 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Michel-Galaviz, No. 05-4146,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's application for a COA was denied, after district court dismissed defendant's motion under § 2255 as untimely, because defendant's § 2255 petition was filed outside the one year limitations period of § 2255(1), defendant did not show new grounds that warranted consideration, and there were no grounds for statutory or equitable tolling.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wollet, No. 03-5113,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court of appeals affirmed district court's judgment denying inmate's motion under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255, seeking order correcting sentence that was imposed after he was convicted of possessing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 2252(a)(4)(B), because there was no merit to inmate's claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
