 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hain v. Mullin, No. 05-5039,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorneys representing a 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 petitioner sentenced to death should have been granted funding to continue representation in state clemency proceedings because the plain language of 21 U.S.C.S. § 848(q) authorized federal funding for such.
|
|||||
| Sparks v. Rittenhouse, No. 04-1086,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Complaint sufficiently alleged an Eighth Amendment claim where the inmate alleged that he had a shoulder injury for which surgery was recommended and that the delay in receiving the surgery caused him considerable pain, and the allegations could have supported an inference that the medical professional was deliberately indifferent to his plight.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
