 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Le Williamson v. Deluxe Fin. Servs., No. 05-3312,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction where the employee's generic submission by e-mail was not the same as "filing" for purposes of Fed. R. App. P. 4 since to be "filed" within the meaning of Fed. R. App. P. 4, the document had to be submitted to the clerk's office by an approved manner.
|
|||||
| Pursley v. Estep, No. 06-1496,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court saw no reason to depart from the judgment of the district court that petitioner's motions for appointment of counsel did not state adequate factual or legal grounds for relief, as required for tolling under Colo. R. Crim. P. 35(c)(3)(iv), and thus, because the statute of limitations was not tolled, his § 2254 petition was untimely.
|
|||||
| Tucker v. Wiley, No. 06-1415,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a prisoner was granted all of the due process protections that he was due--the record showed that the "some evidence" standard was more than adequately met--in his disciplinary hearing for setting fire to his cell, his § 2241 petition was denied and his appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Hernandez-De Jesus, No. 06-2128,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the court agreed with defense counsel, after a full examination of the record before it and consideration of counsel's Anders brief, that there were no nonfrivolous issues upon which to appeal, the appeal was dismissed and counsel was allowed to withdraw.
|
|||||
| United States v. Leon, No. 06-3195,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's plea agreement fully set forth a broad waiver that he knowingly and voluntarily waived any right to appeal, he confirmed the same at the plea hearing, and his claim that he was mentally incompetent at the time of the hearing was contradicted by psychiatric evaluations, his waiver was enforced and his appeal dismissed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Moctezuma-Salinas, No. 06-4166,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a district court's finding that a waiver in defendant's plea agreement was valid and enforceable as to the claims raised in his § 2255 motion, because he did not challenge the validity of the agreement, was not reasonably subject to debate, defendant was not entitled to a COA.
|
|||||
| United States v. Singleton, No. 06-2127,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the retroactivity of Booker and Blakely was not debatable among reasonable jurists, defendant's arguments could not support a COA to challenge the denial of his 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 motion; moreover, defendant's motion was untimely.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
