 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Basnet v. Gonzales, No. 03-9551,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: BIA's adverse credibility findings in an asylum case were not supported by substantial evidence; nothing in the record or common sense showed that an alien should have been able to identify callers who had threatened his life, and BIA's explanation of its rejection of other testimony was vague.
|
|||||
| Reed v. Mineta, No. 05-1057,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court applied an erroneous legal standard in its decision to calculate prejudgment interest on a former employee's entire back pay award under Title VII as of the date of his termination, instead of calculating it incrementally as his wages were earned but unpaid from the date of his termination through entry of judgment.
|
|||||
| Robbins v. United States BLM, No. 05-8087,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner's claim that the voiding of the settlement agreement violated his Fifth Amendment procedural due process rights failed because he failed to point to any provision of the agreement that granted him a substantive, rather than procedural, benefit. Thus, he failed to establish that he had a protected property interest in the agreement.
|
|||||
| United States v. Banda, No. 05-3234,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's 150-month sentence, imposed on remand, for having violated 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841 and 846; the district court properly considered hearsay evidence when determining what drug quantity was attributable to defendant, and no jury finding concerning drug quantity was necessary.
|
|||||
| United States v. Brothers, No. 05-5062,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court did not err in dismissing a juror for cause under Fed. R. Crim. P. 24(c), after she claimed that she could not concentrate due to traumatic experiences in her past, because such a reason was sufficient cause for dismissal, and there was no indication that replacing her resulted in a biased jury or an otherwise unfair trial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
