Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - 10th Circuit Court of Appeals - March 13, 2007
	United States v. Helmstetter, No. 06-1045, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Conviction was affirmed because age was an acceptable race-neutral justification for a peremptory strike, defendant's Sixth Amendments rights were not violated because he was never precluded from cross-examining a co-defendant, and exclusion of his testimony about his co-defendant's drug use did not violate his Fifth Amendment due process rights. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Orozco, No. 05-3396, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Government's motion to enforce a waiver of the right to appeal was granted because the court found nothing to except the case from the consequences of the broad appeal waiver included in defendant's plea agreement. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Williams, No. 06-2328, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A prisoner's request for a COA was denied because his habeas petition was not timely filed, and none of the delays he cited constituted extraordinary circumstances beyond his control such that equitable tolling of the limitations period was available. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.