 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Shields, No. 06-1131,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A conviction for conspiring to retaliate against a witness was upheld. Even if certain testimony was improperly admitted as an "excited utterance," its admission constituted harmless error because the evidence of a conspiracy was overwhelming, particularly as there was a video surveillance of the assault and testimony of defendant's conversations.
|
|||||
| United States v. Valenzuela-Puentes, No. 04-2283,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the government had a compelling interest under the Fourteenth Amendment in prosecuting defendant in parity with defendant's interest in refusing medication, there was not clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the finding that involuntary medication significantly furthered the government's interest in prosecuting defendant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
