 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Coffman v. Higgins, No. 05-7122,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A pro se state inmate's application for a COA was denied, and the appeal was dismissed because the district court's resolution of the procedural default issue was not reasonably debatable, and the inmate had waived his due process claim since he had not raised it in his 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 petition in the district court.
|
|||||
| True Oil Co. v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., No. 05-8028,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insurer's motion for partial summary judgment was granted in a dispute relating to defense obligations because there was no "insured contract" within the meaning of the policy between the owner and an insured; an indemnification agreement was unenforceable under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 30-1-131.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
