 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Ibarra-Guzman, No. 06-2167,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court of appeals dismissed defendant's appeal from district court's judgment sentencing him to 24 months' imprisonment for violating 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326 by reentering the U.S. after he was deported for committing a felony, and granted defendant's counsel's motion to withdraw, because sentence was reasonable and no meritorious appellate issue existed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Vaca-Perez, No. 06-2269,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's sentence within the U.S.S.G. range was fully appropriate in light of the facts that the inmate illegally reentered the United States approximately half a year after he had been deported, the probation for his aggravated burglary conviction was revoked twice, and he had a history of alcohol abuse and alcohol-related offenses.
|
|||||
| United States v. Villegas-Molina, No. 06-2288,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, March 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the court sentenced the inmate within the relevant U.S.S.G. range, his sentence was presumptively reasonable and he had not rebutted that presumption by showing the sentence was unreasonable in light of the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a). Thus, no meritorious appellate issues existed and counsel's motion to withdraw was granted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
