Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - 10th Circuit Court of Appeals - April 7, 2006
	United States v. Palermo, No. 05-4259, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A district court's order dismissing a pro se inmate's 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 motion was vacated, and the case was remanded because the appellate court issued a COA on the inmate's ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The district court erred in applying the Roe factors to assess the inmate's credibility. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Salome-Gonzalez, No. 05-4207, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A district court was not required to justify a lower sentence based on defendant's personal history and characteristics and sound reasons were apparent for the sentence imposed under the advisory guidelines, including the need to avoid disparities and the seriousness of the crime, as reflected in the quantity of methamphetamine possessed. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Wyandotte Nation v. Sebelius, No. 04-3431, 04-3432, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Because the district court did not provide notice, and because it had no legal basis for enjoining the Indian tribe from conducting gaming activities on land known as the Shriner Tract, the injunction issued under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 barring the tribe from conducting gaming on the Shriner Tract was vacated. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.