 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Solano-Cuesta, No. 05-2067,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence was affirmed because the process employed by the district court was reasonable and defendant failed to rebut the presumption of reasonableness of his guidelines sentence; the court routinely upheld as reasonable the use of prior convictions to calculate both criminal history and an enhancement where authorized by the guidelines.
|
|||||
| United States v. Templeman, No. 06-1129,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a codefendant acted improperly when he called defendant to testify during their trial on charges that they conspired to retaliate against a witness, while the jury was present, district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant's motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 26.3 for a mistrial but gave the jury a curative instruction.
|
|||||
| Winegeart v. Am. Alternative Ins. Corp., No. 06-8048,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err when it found that a fireman who was injured when he was struck by a car while he was at the scene of an automobile accident was not covered by an insurance policy the fire department purchased on a vehicle the fireman drove to the scene of the accident because the fireman was outside the vehicle when he was injured.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
