 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Walker, No. 05-5127,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, May 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in letting federal agents testify as to meaning of terms used in recorded phone call that was offered as proof of drug trafficking conspiracy nor as to extent of defendant's drug trafficking network as testimony was helpful to jury within meaning of Fed R. Evid. 702 and defendant failed to show plain error in its admission.
|
|||||
| United States v. Whitaker, No. 05-1258,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, May 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841 and 846 was affirmed because there was evidence showing defendant's distribution of large quantities of crack and that a co-defendant and defendant had a common objective to distribute crack cocaine to a group of shared customers.
|
|||||
| Vann v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., No. 05-5034,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, May 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee sought and obtained a lateral position in another city but was transferred back after 10 weeks because she failed the training program for the new position, the transfer back to her old position was not an adverse employment action under Title VII, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e-2, because any relocation expense was minimal.
|
|||||
| Wolfe v. Barnhart, No. 04-5194,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, May 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The SSA and the Office of Government Ethics correctly interpreted 5 C.F.R. § 2635.807(a) in denying an administrative law judge permission to collect royalties from publication of his textbook on Social Security disability law; moreover, the regulation was not an impermissible prior restraint on speech in violation of the First Amendment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
