 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Angel v. Torrance County Sheriff's Dep't, No. 05-2342,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, June 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted on a wrongful arrest civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 because the arrestee failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact relevant to the claims and his appellate argument was primarily an attack on the factual basis of state court's probable cause determination.
|
|||||
| Douglass v. UAW Local Union 31, No. 05-3178, No. 05-3184,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, June 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err when it entered summary judgment in pro se actions employee filed against former employer and labor union, without ruling on employee's motion to compel discovery, because employee did not comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) by showing how extra time would allow her to obtain documents she needed to oppose summary judgment.
|
|||||
| Panjaitan v. Gonzales, No. 05-9565,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, June 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No due process violation occurred regarding the transcript or translation of an alien's immigration hearing because alleged transcript deficiencies could not have materially affected the outcome. Denial of withholding of removal and denial of relief under CAT were based on an adverse credibility finding, and alien's asylum application was untimely.
|
|||||
| Sitsler v. Barnhart, No. 05-5197,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, June 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: ALJ erred when he denied a claimant's application for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits without discussing additional limitations a psychologist addressed in a second report he submitted, and because he did not submit a new hypothetical question to a vocational expert after he received the psychologist's second report.
|
|||||
| United States v. Prows, Nos. 05-4164, No. 05-4242,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, June 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in dismissing a § 1255 motion. It did not lack jurisdiction over motion merely because United States filed notice of appeal challenging sentence. Pro se § 2255 motion did not have to be signed by counsel. District court erred when it stayed execution of sentence; 1984 Sentencing Reform Act repealed its authority to grant stay.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
