 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Clanton v. Inter.net Global, LLC, No. 04-14120,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for sellers in suit against a buyer's subsidiaries to recover "holdback" payment that buyer agreed to pay when purchasing sellers' business, was vacated; contract stated that subsidiaries assumed only those obligations directly related to assets that buyer transferred to them, and the "holdback" payment did not relate to those assets.
|
|||||
| NLRB v. Chugach Mgmt. Servs., No. 04-16451,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: NLRB's application for enforcement of order (requiring employer to fully instate individual and pay him damages), 29 U.S.C.S. § 158(a)(1), was denied. Individual, alone, out of all applicants, did not commit without qualification to job requirements including working overtime; willingness to work overtime was one of five essential job requirements.
|
|||||
| United States v. Clark, No. 05-10430 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was reasonable because it was within the guidelines range and the district court considered his age and mental condition but determined that the sentence was appropriate based on his atrocious criminal history of armed bank robberies, including the fact that the present offense involved brandishing a loaded gun and fake bomb.
|
|||||
| United States v. Greer, No. 05-11295 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided , January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's three prior convictions listed in the indictment were for making terroristic threats under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-37, and the prior indictments showed each was for threatening to commit a violent crime, they were "violent felonies" requiring a sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(e).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
