LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 11th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 11, 2006

  
Belmore v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., No. 05-11605, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cano v. Baker, No. 05-11641 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A prevailing plaintiff was not entitled to relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) from a judgment entered 32 years earlier in action challenging Georgia's Abortion Act because district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that it had no authority to reverse United States Supreme Court decision in the case that had not been overruled.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Logreira v. Sec'y for the Dep't of Corr., NO. 05-13778 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Inmate's § 2254 petition was untimely, 28 U.S.C.S. § 2244(d)(1). Inmate argued time for filing petition was equitably tolled for 224 days because state court failed to serve him with copy of order denying state relief during that time; however, after he learned state application had been denied, he waited six months to file § 2254 petition.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Qiao Dan Wang v. United States AG, No. 05-13359 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where an alien claimed her boss sexually harassed her and the Chinese police threatened her to keep quiet, but she was never arrested, detained, or interrogated on account of practicing Falun Gong, she was ineligible for asylum under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158(a)(1), withholding of removal, and relief pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Norman, No. 04-15292, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where police obtained information from an anonymous tipster about drug activity at a residence, that information was corroborated to some extent by police observation, and one defendant threw a bag in the trash during surveillance that contained drug residue, there was sufficient probable cause to support a search warrant for the residence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Prevo, No. 04-15310, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where signs in a prison parking lot warned that cars were subject to searches and defendant drove onto the lot, officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by not permitting her to leave without a search and the gun and cocaine found in her car were properly not suppressed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Riley, No. 05-13775 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a sentencing reduction pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual Amendment 668 was not consistent with the Guidelines, a district court clearly erred by granting a reduction to an inmate's sentence based on Amendment 668 and the advisory Guidelines, and by denying the government's motion for reconsideration.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.