 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. White, No. 05-11965 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided , January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err when it denied a motion which defendant filed, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. § 3582(c)(2), seeking an order modifying or reducing a sentence that was imposed after he was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c), based on his claim that Amendment 591 to the USSG entitled him to relief.
|
|||||
| Watkins v. Southeastern Newspapers, Inc., No. 05-13869 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided , January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In copyright infringement action, summary judgment in favor of defendant newspaper was affirmed. District court did not err in considering a letter from Copyright Office indicating that plaintiff had not registered his copyright in his book; the letter fell under the public-reports-and-record exception, Fed. R. Evid. 803(8)(C), to the hearsay rule.
|
|||||
| Watson v. Drummond Co., No. 04-15726,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided , January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When polygraph was offered to an employee pursuant to a request by the employee or his agent to benefit the employee by providing an opportunity to prove his innocence, then the employer had not violated 29 U.S.C.S. § 2002(1) of the Employee Polygraph Protection Act. Company's conduct was permitted under the "ongoing investigation" exemption.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
