|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
11th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 23, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Belser, No. 06-13936 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided , January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A district court's 18 U.S.C.S. § 3583(a) revocation of defendant's supervised release was affirmed because the district court's failure to engage, sua sponte, in a Frazier balancing test of defendant's confrontation rights and the government's proffered reasons for denying confrontation was not error, let alone plain error.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Owens, No. 06-12892 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided , January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's 225-month sentence for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 2113(a), was reasonable; although district court considered mitigating factors under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a), defendant had 16-year criminal history, he made death threat to teller during robbery and led police on high-speed chase, and U.S.S.G. range was 210 to 240 months.
|
|
| |
United States v. Valdes, No. 05-16139 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Decided , January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's proposed jury instruction, stating that the conspiracy would not become complete until an overt act in furtherance of the underlying drug crime was committed, was properly denied because a 21 U.S.C.S. § 846 conspiracy did not require completion of an overt act in furtherance of the underlying drug crime.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|