 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Cover, No. 05-13774 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's denial of a prisoner's third motion to reduce his sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. § 3582(c)(2) was affirmed because the district court had the discretion to determine whether to reduce the prisoner's sentence and did not abuse that discretion by choosing to retain the prisoner's then current sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Oatneal, No. 05-11844,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 30-month sentence after revocation of his supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. § 3583(e) was affirmed because defendant did not show that the district court failed to consider the Chapter 7 policy statements at U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4 and defendant's substantial rights were not affected.
|
|||||
| United States v. Sweeting, No. 05-11062 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 24 month consecutive sentence for violating his supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. § 3583(e) was affirmed because it was within the applicable statutory maximum and the recommended Guideline range, and was reasonable in light of the evidence of his conduct while on supervised release.
|
|||||
| United States v. Valladares, No. 05-12967,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 240-month sentence on his guilty plea to conspiring with the intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846 was reasonable because the district court considered the factors under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) and was not required to elaborate or discuss each of them on the record.
|
|||||
| Williams v. N. Fla. Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc., No. 05-13723 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration. The information concerning the individual was not new because the employee had admitted in her motion that she had previous knowledge about the incident with the individual, and therefore relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 was not warranted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
