 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Johnson, No. 06-12071 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided , January 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(b)(1)(B)(ii) and 846 was affirmed because the admission of a DEA agent's testimony regarding a taped telephone conversation that was played for the jury was harmless error; the agent's explanation of the terms in the conversation was duplicative of a co-conspirator's testimony.
|
|||||
| United States v. Micolta, No. 06-13841 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided , January 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to show that within-guidelines 135 month prison term was an unreasonable sentence for his former 46 U.S.C.S. app. § 1903(a), (g), (j), and 21 U.S.C.S. § 960(b)(1)(B)(ii) conspiracy and cocaine possession convictions. District court imposed sentence after considering mitigation evidence and 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) sentencing factors.
|
|||||
| United States v. Trucchio, No. 05-14830,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided , January 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 1962(d) was affirmed since a witness's testimony did not violate defendant's Confrontation Clause rights, and the fact the defense counsel's father was linked to the same crime family as defendant did not trigger the district court's duty to inquire if defense counsel had a conflict of interest.
|
|||||
| Xin Wen Chi v. United States AG, No. 06-11843 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 30, 2007, Decided , January 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for review was dismissed as to an alien's application for asylum and withholding of removal as the appellate court lacked jurisdiction since the petition was not timely, and petition was denied as to the alien's claim for CAT relief because substantial evidence supported the IJ's finding that the alien was not eligible for CAT relief.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
