 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. United States DOJ, No. 05-13609 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) claim was properly denied because, although the district court erroneously found that the request failed to adequately identify the records sought, as plaintiff had received the documents, the issue had become moot and plaintiff was not entitled to injunctive relief under the FOIA.
|
|||||
| De Castro Polo v. Fairman, No. 05-12829 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's dismissal of a naturalized citizen's petition for a writ of mandamus to compel U.S. Embassy officials to issue his wife a visa was affirmed because the doctrine of consular nonreviewability deprived the court of subject-matter jurisdiction; judicial review was not available under the APA.
|
|||||
| Enwonwu v. Trans Union, LLC, No. 05-13695 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an FCRA case, the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of a credit reporting agency was affirmed because the evidence did not support an inference that the inaccurate information included in the report was the cause of the debtor's inability to obtain satisfactory financing in the three transactions.
|
|||||
| Laosebikan v. Coca-Cola Co., No. 05-13174 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former employee's Title VII and 42 U.S.C.S. § 1981 race discrimination suit was properly dismissed; former employer offered legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for failing to promote the employee and later discharging him, which was that the employee lacked the necessary management experience and that he threatened his supervisor.
|
|||||
| McNamee v. SSA, No. 05-14805 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's affirmance of denial of claimant's applications for disability benefits and SSI was affirmed; ALJ's failure to give any weight to evaluating physician's opinion of claimant's limitations was supported by substantial evidence where physician's opinion was inconsistent with his examination and physician was not treating physician.
|
|||||
| Reynolds v. Murray, No. 05-14779 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly dismissed inmate's 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 suit alleging that law enforcement officers conducted illegal search of his home; suit was time-barred under two-year statute of limitations in O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33 (1982) where it was filed more than four years after search took place and inmate did not assert that tolling was warranted.
|
|||||
| United States v. Armstrong, No. 05-12959 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: That defendant was acquitted of the charge of conspiracy to distribute cocaine did not affect his conviction for conspiring to launder money under 18 U.S.C.S. § 1956(h), because his guilt of the underlying drug activity was not an element of § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i).
|
|||||
| United States v. Beard, No. 05-11070 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Beard, No. 05-11078 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
