|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
11th Circuit Court of Appeals - February 2, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
Hicks v. Jordan, No. 05-14349 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided , February 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a petition for writ of habeas corpus is brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 2241, exhaustion of administrative remedies was jurisdictional. District court properly dismissed the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Additionally, the government did not waive the issue by arguing alternatively that claims failed on the merits.
|
|
| |
Jackson v. Crosby, No. 04-15992,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided , February 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where Supreme Court ruled Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) motion in 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 case was not to be treated as successive habeas petition if it did not assert, or reassert, claims of error in state conviction, inmate was not entitled to COA where he was merely seeking to gain second chance at appeal with use of Rule 60(b) motion.
|
|
| |
Lafavors v. Jenne, No. 05-14410 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided , February 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: District court's judgment as a matter of law on behalf of a deputy, following a jury verdict for a suspect that the deputy arrested, was affirmed because the force used by the deputy in the arrest of the suspect was reasonable as a matter of law. Further, even if a constitutional violation did occur, the deputy was entitled to qualified immunity.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Alvarez, No. 05-13367 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided , February 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant waived the right to appeal a district court's denial of a minor role reduction in sentencing where the district court questioned him about a sentence appeal waiver contained in his plea agreement during his plea colloquy, explained the effect of the waiver, and confirmed that he understood the types of challenges he was waiving.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|