 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Collier v. Dickinson, No. 06-12614,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided , February 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the plain language of the Driver Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), clearly, unambiguously, and expressly created a statutory right which could be enforced by enabling aggrieved individuals to sue persons who disclosed their personal information in violation of the DPPA, plaintiffs' claim survived a motion to dismiss.
|
|||||
| Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. Poe (In re Poe), No. 05-16518,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided , February 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Title insurer had a statutory right of redemption as to a parcel of land because the mortgagors were "debtors" as to the parcel under Ala. Code § 6-5-248, despite selling the parcel to a buyer, since the mortgagors remained liable on the debt as to the parcel and the parcel was foreclosed as a result of the mortgagors' default.
|
|||||
| Thornton v. Fedex Ground Package Sys., No. 06-14079 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided , February 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of a company on an individual's breach of contract and negligence claims was affirmed because the individual failed to show evidence of a contract between himself and the company, and the individual did not identify a legal duty that the company allegedly breached.
|
|||||
| United States v. Court, No. 05-16533,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided , February 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions and sentences for violating 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 963 and 846 were affirmed because, inter alia, the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, and the district court did not err by imposing sentences based on a quantity of cocaine the district court determined by a preponderance of the evidence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Madison, No. 06-11914 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided , February 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 168-month sentence for his violation of 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 1591(a)(2) and 2423(e) was affirmed because, under the current version of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2G1.3(c)(3), defendant's use of violence and fear to cause a prostitute to engage in a sexual act with another satisfied the cross-reference in § 2G1.3(c)(3).
|
|||||
| Wen Lin v. United States AG, No. 06-14218 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Decided , February 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: BIA did not err in denying alien's motion for reconsideration of a decision affirming an order denying asylum relief; motion merely reiterated arguments raised in initial appeal, which BIA considered but was not persuaded by, and there was no requirement that BIA provide a detailed explanation of why it chose to deny the motion for reconsideration.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
