|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
11th Circuit Court of Appeals - February 21, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Wims, No. 06-13037 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's 360-month sentence for violating 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(ii), (b)(1)(A)(iii), and 846 was affirmed because he was precluded from claiming that his sentence was unreasonable since he had induced or invited the sentence that he was challenging.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Zahnd v. Sec'y of the Dep't of Agric., No. 06-11571,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A trainer's petition was denied as a judicial officer was entitled to rely on his review of the videotape of the examinations and the expert testimony of a veterinarian, who performed a reliable examination of a horse, rather than the vague and speculative testimony of two lay witnesses to find that a horse was sore under the Horse Protection Act.
|
|
| |
Zeng Lam Wang v. United States AG, No. 06-13356 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The aliens' petition seeking review of the BIA's denial of the claims for asylum, based on fear of subjection to China's coercive population control measures, was granted, the denial motion was vacated, and the case was remanded because the BIA's analysis was facially incoherent, and the BIA did not address all of the aliens' evidence.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|