 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Tran, No. 05-12820 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2006, Decided , February 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions and sentences for violating 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 152 and 157 were affirmed since his alleged request for his bankruptcy lawyer's business card was insufficient to invoke his right to counsel, and the court's general finding supported the application of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 enhancement.
|
|||||
| United States v. Williams, Nos. 05-12805 and 05-12952 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 28, 2006, Decided , February 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Retroactive application of Booker to defendant's case did not violate ex post facto principles because defendant had fair warning that he faced up to 10 years imprisonment, that the court had discretion under U.S.S.G. to increase his sentence based on his criminal history, and that the court could consider his arrest record in deciding to depart.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
