 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barreto v. United States AG, No. 05-14284 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 1, 2006, Decided , March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review of BIA order affirming immigration judge's denial of asylum and withholding of removal was denied; even if the alien's testimony had been consistent and credible, because Colombia paramilitary groups threatened the alien only by phone, he failed to establish past persecution for purposes of 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(42).
|
|||||
| Douglas v. Ala. Dep't of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, No. 05-13880 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 1, 2006, Decided , March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment against former employee was affirmed as to race discrimination claim, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e-2(a)(1). Employee conceded she violated employer's rules against carrying bags around patients after receiving numerous reprimands from the employer, and record evidence showed she was reprimanded for laughing at patient.
|
|||||
| Lozano-Castro v. United States AG, No. 05-12976 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 1, 2006, Decided , March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pro se aliens' petition for review was dismissed as to the ineffective assistance of counsel claim because the court lacked jurisdiction to consider it; the remaining two claims were denied because substantial evidence supported the IJ's determination that the aliens failed to show either past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution.
|
|||||
| Monroy v. United States AG, No. 05-14285 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 1, 2006, Decided , March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alien's petition for review was denied because substantial evidence supported the BIA's conclusion that the alien failed to meet his burden of proving past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution. The alien was not eligible for asylum, withholding of removal, or CAT relief.
|
|||||
| United States v. Durham, No. 05-12298 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 1, 2006, Decided , March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion to withdraw plea of guilty to charge of violating 21 U.S.C.S. § 846 was affirmed; even if district court failed to explain elements of offense, it observed core objectives of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 by ensuring that defendant discussed indictment with counsel, by explaining penalties, and by addressing rights waived by pleading guilty.
|
|||||
| United States v. Plater, No. 05-15385 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 1, 2006, Decided , March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
