 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. Brock, No. 05-13542 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided , March 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a district court considered an employee's bankruptcy petition in granting judgment on the pleadings to an employer in a Title VII discrimination suit, district court erred in converting the motion to one for summary judgment without giving the employee notice of conversion and 10 days to respond, as was required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c), 56.
|
|||||
| Fuster-Escalona v. Fla. Dep't of Corr., No. 04-15355 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided , March 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's denial of a state inmate's 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 petition was affirmed because, inter alia, the inmate did not show that the state appellate court's rejected of his Confrontation Clause claim was contrary to, or an unreasonable application of federal law, and his general due process claim did not state a cognizable habeas claim.
|
|||||
| Great Am. E&S Ins. Co. v. Sadiki, No. 04-15630,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided , March 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court in Florida properly held that under Florida choice of law rules, insurance policy covering property in Florida had to be construed under Florida law. Because Florida courts had not disagreed with this U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit precedent, certification of this issue to the Florida Supreme Court was not warranted.
|
|||||
| Kadalie v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Ga., No. 05-13196, No. 05-14636,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided , March 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, where university president and vice-president challenged denial of qualified immunity. Mixed motive issue turned on fact issue of whether jury reasonably could find president and vice-president acted against plaintiff for some reason other than, or in addition to, speech on matter of public concern.
|
|||||
| United States v. Lopez-Cruz, No. 05-13044 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 3, 2006, Decided , March 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the government was permitted to engage in strategic undercover operations in order to discover illegal drugs, its use of a cooperating inmate, who was allowed to continue his bookmaking operations in order to maintain his connections to the prison's drug traffickers, was not outrageous in light of the totality of the circumstances.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
