 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ramos v. United States, No. 05-14918,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided , March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's denial of a federal inmate's 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 motion was affirmed because the inmate's claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel failed since sufficient evidence existed to support both of the inmate's convictions and the fundamental fairness of the trial was not compromised; a magistrate judge found no prejudice.
|
|||||
| United States v. Blasingame, No. 04-11281,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided , March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a joint trial of two codefendants for robbing an armored truck and shooting a guard, even if the admission of codefendant #2's confession was a Bruton error under the Sixth Amendment, codefendant #1 failed to show prejudice because three testifying coconspirators, all of whom identified codefendant #1 as a shooter, were ineffectively impeached.
|
|||||
| United States v. McCarter, No. 05-11121,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided , March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence, including testimony that defendants one and three spoke about their fraudulent activities and concocted a scheme through defendant two's company to funnel money to defendant one in exchange for awarding of contracts to defendant three, was sufficient to support their convictions for violating 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 2, 201, 371, 666, 1343, 1346.
|
|||||
| United States v. Velasco-Venancio, No. 06-13709 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided , March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 46-month sentence for violating 8 U.S.C.S. § 1346(a) and (b)(2) was affirmed because the decision by the district court to give defendant's criminal history, the need for deterrence, and the applicable USSG range more weight than defendant's mitigating evidence was committed to the district court's discretion.
|
|||||
| Wainwright v. Comm'r of the SSA, No. 06-15638 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided , March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The affirmation of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income was affirmed since, inter alia, the ALJ was entitled to reject an examining psychologist's opinion as his opinion was contrary to the opinions and assessments of the other state agency psychologists.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
