|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
11th Circuit Court of Appeals - March 12, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Harper, No. 06-11028,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 12, 2007, Decided , March 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's convictions on three counts of bank robbery, using firearms to commit the three robberies, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon were affirmed and his 1044-month sentence was affirmed because there was no merit to any of the five arguments that he presented on appeal.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Ryals, No. 06-12308,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 12, 2007, Decided , March 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Government's suit to reduce tax assessments to judgment was timely filed on May 20, 2003, as one offer in compromise suspended 10-year statute of limitations, 26 U.S.C.S. § 6502(a)(1), for time it was pending, plus one additional year, and second offer added six months and nine days, extending period to July 9, 2003, 26 U.S.C.S. § 6331(k), (i)(5).
|
|
| |
United States v. Williams, 05-15499,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 12, 2007, Decided , March 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendants' convictions on various fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering charges were affirmed because, inter alia, there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions, and one defendant's sentence was affirmed because, inter alia, the district court did not err in enhancing the sentence for obstruction of justice.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
