LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 11th Circuit Court of Appeals - March 13, 2007

  
United States v. Green, No. 06-12946 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Hoang Cao, No. 06-10997 Non-Argument Calendar, No. 06-11101 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because defendant was part of international drug trafficking conspiracy and was a first-level distributor responsible for providing one cell with cocaine and MDMA, there was ample evidence for four-level sentence enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1 based on his leadership in conspiracy involving more than five participants.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Johnson, No. 05-13093, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's 51-month sentence for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 1001 was affirmed because the district court had sufficient, reliable evidence that he had misdemeanor convictions, and the district court did not err in finding that his offense involved more than minimal planning, under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2F1.1(b)(2)(A) (1994).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Phillips, No. 06-13484 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Stone, No. 06-13599 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Williford v. Funderburk (In re Williford), No. 06-15119 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A district court''s decision affirming a bankruptcy court's entry of summary judgment in favor of two attorneys and a law firm was affirmed because the debtors failed to state a claim under the Alabama Legal Services Liability Act.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Xiao Feng Liu v. United States AG, No. 06-13735 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The BIA's decision, affirming without opinion an IJ's order, was vacated, and the case was remanded because the IJ did not consider the documents that an alien submitted with his asylum application and the BIA did not address the documents; the BIA was required to consider the alien's corroborating evidence in the first instance.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.