 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Spears, No. 06-14238 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2007, Decided , March 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(1) were affirmed because, whether or not the district court abused its discretion when it admitted evidence of facts related to a 1998 robbery during which defendant admitted that he possessed a pellet gun, defendant failed to show that the error affected his substantial rights.
|
|||||
| United States v. Swift, No. 05-13729 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2007, Decided , March 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant's conviction for violating 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) was affirmed because the testimony of a confidential informant was not so weak that it would have left a reasonable jury with reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty; there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction.
|
|||||
| United States v. Thomas, No. 06-15177 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2007, Decided , March 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 24-month sentence following revocation of his supervised release was affirmed because the sentence was reasonable; the district court considered: (1) the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range; (2) the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors; and (3) defendant's mitigation arguments.
|
|||||
| United States v. Vargas, No. 06-11127 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2007, Decided , March 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's guilty plea conviction for violating 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(ii), and 846 was affirmed because the record did not suggest either that he did not understand the charges or that he would have changed his plea had the district court explained the charges to him. The district court did not plainly err under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11.
|
|||||
| Whitaker v. MGA, Inc., No. 06-15025 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2007, Decided , March 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Williams v. Barrett, No. 06-13524,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 15, 2007, Decided , March 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
