 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Hankerson, No. 06-13228 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided , March 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant was sentenced as a career offender under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual app. C, amend. 591 did not affect the guideline range under which he was sentenced, and 18 U.S.C.S. § 3582(c)(2) did not apply. Thus, district court properly denied his motion for a sentence reduction under § 3582.
|
|||||
| United States v. Shanez, No. 06-14919 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided , March 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 12-month sentence for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 1952(a)(3) was affirmed because the district court's deviation from the USSG was a variance, not a departure, that was made after the district court considered the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors, and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(h) was inapplicable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Smith, No. 06-14077 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided , March 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 294-month sentence for his violation of 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e) was affirmed since a preponderance of the evidence supported the district court's finding that he possessed the ammunition "in connection with" another felony offense, and the district court did not commit a Booker error.
|
|||||
| United States v. Spangler, No. 06-13881,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided , March 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's imposition of four terms of supervised release to run consecutively for defendant's violation of 26 U.S.C.S. § 7206(1) was vacated and remanded since the terms had to run concurrently, but the district court's order that defendant transfer a promissory to the government for part of the restitution was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Zlotnick v. Premier Sales Group, Inc., No. 06-13305 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided , March 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Seller did not violate Fla. Stat. § 718.502 or Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act by cancelling a buyer's condominium reservation agreement and offering a new agreement reflecting increased purchase price; cancellation was done in accordance with agreement's terms, and the agreement clearly stated that it was not a purchase contract.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
