|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
11th Circuit Court of Appeals - March 20, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
Bachem v. United States AG, No. 06-14333 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Decided , March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Alien was properly denied asylum and withholding of removal under 8 U.S.C.S. §§ 1158, 1231 because he failed to show past persecution where he was never arrested, beaten, or physically tortured and verbal threats were insufficient. He could not show refugee status for asylum, and an adverse credibility finding was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Thompson v. United States, No. 05-16970,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Decided , March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because counsel did not adequately consult with defendant about his right to appeal and a reasonable probability existed that, had there been adequate consultation, defendant would have appealed his differential sentence as to codefendants, defendant established ineffective assistance of counsel, and judgment denying his § 2255 motion was reversed.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Glover, No. 06-11307 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Decided , March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's 72-month sentence for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(1) was affirmed because the district court did not engage in impermissible double counting, and the sentence was neither procedurally nor substantively unreasonable; the district court considered the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors, and the sentence was at the low end of the USSG.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|