 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Vasquez v. United States AG, No. 06-15078 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Decided , March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: BIA properly denied alien's motion to consider under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 because the motion failed to identify errors of fact or law, failed to cite supporting authority, and failed to establish that immigration judge erred in finding that asylum application was untimely or that the alien's testimony was incredible.
|
|||||
| Xi Chen v. United States AG, No. 06-14707 Non-Argument Calendar, No. 06-14708 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Two brothers, Chinese natives, failed to carry their burden for asylum under 8 U.S.C.S. §§ 1158(a)(1), 1101(a)(42) because adverse credibility findings were supported by substantial evidence of inconsistencies and a failure to provide detailed testimony of the asylum claims. Further, corroborative evidence did not compel a finding of error.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
