 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Champ v. Calhoun County Emergency Mgmt. Agency, No. 06-14364 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 26, 2007, Decided , March 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment entered in favor of the county and its commissioners was affirmed because the employee had not established gender discrimination under Title VII or § 1983. The employee had not provided evidence to overcome the county's assertion that the other candidate was more qualified for the position.
|
|||||
| Mauco v. United States AG, No. 06-14288 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 26, 2007, Decided , March 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alien's petition was dismissed as to his underlying asylum and withholding of removal claims since the court lacked jurisdiction as the petition was not timely filed as to those claims; the petition was dismissed as to the alien's challenge to the denial of his motion for reconsideration as he had arguably abandoned any challenge to that denial.
|
|||||
| United States v. Crumpton, No. 05-17244 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 26, 2007, Decided , March 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) was affirmed since he waived his right to challenge the denial of his motion to suppress when he entered an unconditional, voluntary guilty plea; his sentence was affirmed since the district court considered, inter alia, the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
