 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Roberts, No. 05-12217 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided , March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of attempting to engage a person under the age of 18 for commercial sex purposes in or affecting interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 1594(a), because defendant could not establish the inducement element of entrapment and defendant's conduct had the necessary effect on interstate commerce.
|
|||||
| United States v. Sinisterra-Garcia, No. 05-12041 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence of 135 months of imprisonment for violating 46 U.S.C.S. app. § 1903(a) and (g) and 21 U.S.C.S. § 960(b)(1)(B) was affirmed because the district court did not clearly err in denying defendant a U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.2 minor-role reduction. Additionally, the sentence was reasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Worden, No. 05-15135 Non-Argument Calendar,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided , March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed because the government did not breach the plea agreement by challenging defendant's request for probation and asserting that he should instead receive the low-end sentence of six months of imprisonment. The government had agreed not to contest defendant's request for a sentence at the low end of the USSG.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
