LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 11th Circuit Court of Appeals - April 4, 2006

  
Azim v. United States AG, No. 05-12520, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bergen v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 05-14683 Non-Argument Calendar, No. 05-14684 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A district court's determination that 42 U.S.C.S. § 406(b)(1)(A) did not permit an award of attorney's following an award of past-due benefits on remand was vacated, and the case was remanded because that determination frustrated the underlying congressional policy of encouraging effective legal representation of claimants.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Evans v. Ga. Pac., Inc., No. 05-14585 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Grant of summary judgment to corporation against driver's malicious prosecution claim was affirmed. Driver presented no evidence to raise genuine issue of material fact that there was lack of probable cause to initially move forward with underlying case or that employee of corporation maliciously set forth to falsely accuse driver of grand theft.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Flemenbaum v. Fla. Dep't of Children & Families, No. 05-12779, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gibson v. Gains, No. 05-15997 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A district court's dismissal of a taxpayer's 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 1983 and 1985 case against the State of Alabama, the Alabama Department of Revenue, and two employees was affirmed because, inter alia, the district court lacked jurisdiction under the Tax Injunction Act, and it did not err is declining supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
P.J. v. Gordon, No. 05-11482, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Powell v. Morton Plant Mease Health Care, Inc., No. 05-16033 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where evidence did not establish as a matter of law that employee was salaried and an executive, employer was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law under FLSA's executive exemption. Employer's motion for new trial was properly denied because there was sufficient evidence from which jury could have inferred that employee was an hourly worker.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Stratus Pharms., Inc. v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. (In re Stratus Pharms., Inc.), No. 05-12272, 04-CV-21167, 04-CV-21168, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Anderson, No. 05-14848 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Asprilla, No. 05-14948 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Decided , April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's 135-month sentence following his guilty plea to violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 2, 46 U.S.C.S. app. § 1903(a), (g), and (j), and 21 U.S.C.S. § 960(b)(1)(B)(ii) was affirmed because the district court did not clearly error in denying him a mitigating role reduction pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.2.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.