Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - 11th Circuit Court of Appeals - April 6 - April 7, 2006
	Garrido v. United States AG, No. 04-15542, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Immigration judge's finding that alien was not entitled to asylum or withholding of removal was supported by substantial evidence; alien was not credible where she gave conflicting information about alleged incidents of persecution by guerilla group in Peru and documents could not be authenticated, nor did they appear to be authentic. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Serna-Flores, No. 05-14632 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: District court did not err in considering defendant's two prior state convictions for purposes of sentencing defendant for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(5); defendant failed to show that state convictions were presumptively void because he did not offer documentation or testimony to show that his waivers of counsel on state convictions were void. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Williams, No. 04-15128, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Decided , April 6, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Because the court found the PROTECT Act pandering provision, 18 U.S.C.S. § 2252A(a)(3)(B), both substantially overbroad and vague, and therefore facially unconstitutional, the court reversed defendant's conviction under that section. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	White v. United States, No. 05-14470 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: District court erred in considering abandoned inmate's claim that 18 U.S.C.S. § 2252 was invalid due to lack of enactment clause when his 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 motion was remanded for consideration on merits, as inmate had not intended to abandon claim, but error was harmless because federal law did not require statutes to contain enactment clauses. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Alpha International v. General Foam Plastics (In re Empire of Carolina, Inc.), No. 05-11830, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Decided , April 7, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Appeals court found no abuse of discretion in bankruptcy court order granting motion to intervene filed by third party who was substantial creditor of debtors as well as party to asset purchase agreement involving debtors' property despite objection of another party because Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7024(b) allowed permissive intervention under such facts. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Price v. M & H Valve Co., No. 05-15205 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Decided , April 7, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Employee's claims of discriminatory failure to promote that were filed under Title VII were properly disposed of summary judgment because he did not file his EEOC charge until May 1, 2001, 184 days and more than 20 months after two Caucasian co-workers' promotions, and therefore the employee failed to timely exhaust his administrative remedies. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Lyons, No. 05-15008 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Decided , April 7, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: District court's application of two-level enhancement allowed by USSG § 3B1.1(c) to defendant's sentence based on finding that defendant had exercised leadership in commission of armed bank robbery was affirmed because defendant failed to show clear error and failed to show either that sentence was unreasonableness or that double-counting occurred. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Roper, No. 05-12235 Non-Argument Calendar, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Decided , April 7, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's sentences for the underlying drug offenses were enhanced under USSG § 3A1.2 because he shot at a police officer; his sentences were not enhanced because he possessed or brandished a firearm. Amendment 599 did not alter the applicable guideline range and provided no basis for reducing defendant's sentence under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3582. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.